Category Archives: You Need to See It

Stuck In The ‘Looper’ With You

In 1985, Robert Zemeckis became the “talk of the town” when he, along with Universal Studios, released a mainstream summer flick that was simply titled ‘Back to the Future.’ It had teen heart-throb Michael J. Fox, a catchy song by Huey Lewis and The News, and special-effects that were totally ahead of its time. What people expected to be a fun, “popcorn” movie, ended up becoming a fully fledged pop-culture phenomena. And sure, I am a little biased; ‘Back to the Future’ is one of my favorite movies of all time (check out our ‘Top 10 Lists’ link at the top of your page), but I really do think that when it comes to science fiction, humor, excitement, entertainment, and making the perfect ‘time-travel’ movie, ‘Back to the Future’ nails it.

I only write the above paragraph of geeky fan-boy praise to bring this up; in my mind, ever since the ‘Back to the Future’ franchise was wrapped up, the ‘time travel’ movie has really been done to death, often producing less than stellar results. I always hope that I’ll walk out with the same magic that Zemeckis gave me, but I usually end up burying my head in my hands, asking ‘Hello? McFly?’

Every once in awhile, you’ll get a ‘Groundhog Day’ or ’12 Monkeys’, which give you hope that a good time jumper movie is still possible; but for every good one, there is about 10 bad ones out there; ‘The Time Traveler’s Wife’, ‘Terminator’ 3 and 4, ‘The Time Machine (2002)’, ‘The Butterfly Effect’, ‘Clockstoppers’ (I must abandon my nostalgia and be objective on this one), ‘Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure’ (don’t try to prove to me that this is a good movie. It’s garbage. Watch it again, I promise it doesn’t hold up over time), and I could go on… for a while. I get it, I understand that there is the difference between a time travel movie that is serious and one that is a comedy, but goodness, why does your time travel movie have to be eulogy or completely idiotic? ‘Donnie Darko’ makes you want to jump off your own roof, and ‘Hot Tub Time Machine’ makes you want to flee from the theater.

It’s the list of sub-par movies above that make you want to look up to the heavens and thank somebody when a movie like ‘Looper’ comes around. Not only is it a great work of sci-fi, taking a totally different angle on an overdone concept, but ‘Looper’ is also one of the most wildly entertaining, thought provoking, unique, and thrilling movies you can spend your money on. And when I say thrilling, I mean the ‘adrenaline shot to your aortic valve’ kind of thrilling.

The film is titled ‘Looper,’ but it is also the profession of our central character. The year is 2044, and Joe (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) is a looper; and what does that mean? Well, here’s where it starts to get complicated. You see, in 2044, time travel has yet to be invented, but in thirty years time travel does exist, and although it is illegal, the mob uses this technology to send their enemies back in time. When their targets arrive, a looper is already waiting for them with a loaded gun, and kills the hooded victims on sight.

This is how the racket works if you’re a looper; you kill the victims that are sent from future, receiving payment in bars of silver for every kill, until one day your future-self appears in front of you. Doing what you’re trained to do, you kill the target on sight, effectively killing your future-self. “This is called ‘closing your loop’.” This is how these future mobsters end your contract, making it as though you never existed in the first place. When you ‘close your loop’, you’re given a lottery-sized pay day and an early retirement. You also get 30 more years to live until, of course, you are sent back in time to be killed, by yourself.

Our story really gets rolling when our “hero,” Joe, lets his target get away. Normally, this would just be a minor problem, except the man that escaped is Joe, from the future (played wonderfully by Bruce Willis). Now, present Joe is trying to hunt and kill his future self, future Joe is trying to change the future, and Joe’s employers are trying to wipe the both of them, present and future, off the map.

Watch future Joe escape! Click here!

Sadly, this is really all that I want to summarize about the plot of ‘Looper’. So much of this movie really depends on the element of surprise and experiencing all of the mind-bending twists and turns, and as always, I don’t want to spoil the fun for anyone.

Now, don’t let the schematics of ‘Looper’ scare you off. Although it takes a few moments to get into it, the action quickly gets rolling and the logic of it all begins to make sense, and the pay-off for this one is huge. It is clear that storytelling is the primary objective for up-and-coming director Rian Johnson, and this objective was reached and then some. I haven’t read the screenplay first hand, but I’m sure that ‘Looper’ is nothing short of a writing gem (Johnson also being the writer of the script.)

Another decision that I think really set this movie apart was the choice to have two separate actors play the same character, the present and future Joe. Although criticized by some, I one-hundred percent support Johnson’s decision to rely on the acting abilities of Gordon-Levitt and Willis to bring this character to life.

Using a very clever make-up job, JGL takes on an entirely different face, and an entirely different persona for that matter. In ‘Looper’, Joseph Gordon-Levitt is really pushed to go beyond his usual character and create a frustratingly neutral, and often unlikable young man. The more I think about it, the character of young Joe really establishes the reality of ‘Looper’; the reality that there are no good guys, and there are no bad guys. Every person in this story has their own motives, their own desires that they are desperate to defend. Maybe that’s what makes this film so flippin’ exciting.

On the flip-side, Willis’ take on Joe is nothing short of marvelous. He takes the groundwork that his younger co-star has given him, and builds a character that is both determined and sorrowful. In one particular scene, where the two Joeys sit down to chat for the first time, Willis brings the movie to a total halt by being the energy behind a commanding bit of dialogue. In all seriousness, this scene, which take place in a vacant country diner, may be the best thing you watch on a screen this year. Don’t miss it.

The best advice I can give you; Go to your local RedBox, Blockbuster, Netflix, or On-Demand provider and check out ‘Looper’ on December 31, when its released on DVD and Blu-Ray. If you hate it, I’ll refund your money myself. Just call my secretary, and they’ll iron out the details.

My Note: Looper is as unique as it is entertaining. You’ll want to go back in time just to see it again.

My Grade: A

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo: Diving into the Nightmare

I love the mystery of a detective story. There is a new brand of thrilling possibilites when a film revolves around a investigator unraveling dark secrets from the past. It is thrilling because I’ve learned over the years what solving a mystery requires; the characters must go somewhere they don’t want to go in order to find the truth. To really find out the reality of the past, the detective must overcome their fear of the unknown and become enveloped and dive into the darkness.

Although, it is easier to take the plunge if you have somewhere there with you; someone that already understands the treacherous waters.

It is at this crossroads where Mikael Blomkvist and Lisbeth Salander meet in the American adaptation of Stieg Larsson’s novel ‘The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.”The best-selling Swedish novel has been able to resonate with readers world wide, but when director David Fincher was able to take give his spin on the story, the best-selling novel became a piece of ambitious filmmaking that deserves recognition.

Mikael Blomkvist (played by Daniel Craig) is a business journalist living in Stockholm known for his “keen investigative mind.” When the film opens, Blomkvist has just been convicted of libel, having recently published an article that accused powerful Swedish executive Hans-Erik Wennerstrom of having ties with organized crime. Embarassed by the conviction and nearly broke from the judgment, Blomkvist receives a phone call, requesting a meeting with the founder of powerful Swedish Firm, Henrik Vanger.

Knowing that Blomkvist is desperate, Henrik Vanger brings him to their eerie island mansion. Henrik wants the journalist to investigate something that has haunted him for years; the murder of his niece Harriet, a murder that occured more than 40 years ago. Mikael agrees to find out what he can, but as he searches, he realizes that Harriet’s death is not just a solitary event, but part of a chain of murders that began years before her disappearance.

The title character of the film, Lisbeth Salander (played by Rooney Mara), is seemingly different from Blomkvist is every way. She is a goth-punk hacker who is pierced from head to toe. Her raven black hair is in stark contrast to her bleached eye-brows which also work in opposition to her blackened retinas. Although she is constantly dressed in leather and chains, the only thing more offensive than Lisbeth’s appearance is her demeanor. You can see that she detests being around people, especially men, and even more especially the wealthy bureaucratic men that she is subject to. She is a ward of the state, being passed around through foster care since childhood. She is plagued by a history of physical and sexual abuse, which she carries around like heavy luggage, making her unwilling to trust anyone that might harm her.

In the first half of the film, the audience watches the separate lives and undertakings of these two people who are separated by age, personality, and circumstance. As Mikael works to find the clues and the missing pieces to Harriet’s death, we watch as Lisbeth is forced to endure the horrible abuse of her new legal guardian. It is truly horrifying to see this sequence of events, how this young woman is forced to endure terrible things for her survival. But, as awful as it is, it is also that much more vital when we see Lisbeth exact her vengeance, not only on her violent and disgusting abuser, but also on all men who want to hurt women.

Blomkvist has found himself in waters that he doesn’t fully understand, forcing him to find someone to help him navigate through the veiled past. It is because of this that Mikael is able to find Lisbeth, only initially searching for a research assistant. When Blomkvist eventually comes to Lisbeth for help, it is an incredible important dialogue that the two characters share. Although they have their different reasons for wanting to find the truth about Harriet, Blomkvist seeking personal redemption and Salander wanting to punish a world of violent men, they both in the end want the same thing. We see them unite for a common purpose; “I want you to help me catch a killer of women.”

By deciding to dive into the mystery together, Lisbeth does something that she has, until this point, refused to do. She must put her trust in man.

There are so many things that I love about this movie. Rooney Mara truly does deliver the performance of the year with her portrayal of Lisbeth Salander. She is able to be both vulnerable and fierce, fragile yet powerful, and the way she brings this character to life is what brings the story together. Although Mara deserves all praise she receives for this film, there is no doubt that Director David Fincher was the master architect of ‘Dragon Tattoo.’ The way that Fincher is able to create a mood for a film is unbelievable, how with a few simple shots in the opening he is able to set the tone for the entire narrative, and he is able to make this movie feel as chilling and mysterious as the subject matter would suggest. However, I’m more than biased. In my mind, David Fincher is the best Director working today.

But Viewer be warned: Although I believe this movie is a fantastic piece of filmmaking, it takes the audience to places that it does not want to go. It is very purposeful in this, trying to get the audience to see everything the characters must go through, and I mean everything. Specifically, there is one scene in which the heroine is brutally violated. It is because of this scene that I can’t openly recommend it without a disclaimer of sorts. The film is graphic in its depiction of violence towards women, and I believe that the viewer deserves to know this before watching.

My Note: If you are prepared to dive into the shocking world of ‘Dragon Tattoo,’ take the plunge, because in the end, it is worth it (but don’t say I didn’t warn you).

My Grade: A

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,